Joined in 2023 
82 
63 About this deal
Based on multiple public benchmarks, it is clear that the Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms the Ryzen 7 7800X3D in both single-core and multi-core tasks. In the many single-core tests, the Ryzen 9 7900X3D has scored over 2185, which is 3% higher than the Ryzen 7 7800X3D’s score of about 2127. However, in the multi-core tests, the Ryzen 9 7900X3D had a significantly higher score of 33192, which is 45% higher than the Ryzen 7 7800X3D’s score of 22856. We are still awaiting until we can actually get our hands on it and put it to the test. This means we can’t say for sure which is superior just yet. Though it is looking very possible that the Ryzen 9 7900X3D’s superior performance, made possible thanks to its higher cache size, will justify its higher price. So how do these differences translate into performance? We’ve broken it all down for you below. Ryzen 9 7900X vs 7900X3D – Performance You can refer to the spec table below to see how the full Ryzen 7000 lineup compares. Note that UK prices weren't included in the press release we received, but we're following up with AMD about this and will add this information if we get it. I would guess that Intel's 14th generation will ditch DDR4 for good, but as of now, DDR4 compatibility is one thing that the i9-13900K has going for it over the Ryzen 9 7900X3D.
Video codec acceleration (including at least the HEVC (H.265), H.264, VP9, and AV1 codecs) is subject to and not operable without inclusion/installation of compatible media players. GD-176 As you can see, when we put these two powerhouses head to head we see identical core and thread counts but not much else stays the same. Perhaps the standout difference is the Ryzen 9 7900X3D’s gigantic cache size, which comes into being thanks to its X3D technology. Here, ENERMAX has used an infinity mirror design that is pleasing to the eye. The blend of Infinite RGB Reflection with Enermax’s Luminous Aurabelt technology creates a breathtaking visual effect. Ultimately, the reduced memory latency means that you're getting a chip that runs cooler, draws less power, and performs better thanks to the addition of the second generation of AMD's V-cache. One important similarity the two CPUs share is their Zen 4 architecture. Zen 4 is incredibly powerful and capable of processing far more instruction per cycle than the previous Zen 3. It also made significant steps forwards in terms of energy efficiency, a step which perhaps proves vital to improving the performance of these two CPUs considering how power-hungry they both are.Best Overall CPU Cooler For Ryzen 9 7900X3D Best-Overall-CPU-Cooler-For-Ryzen-9-7900X3D-LArctic-Liquid-Freezer-II Also, they have padded the whole thing with anti-vibration cushions. Consequently, maximum airflow with little noise can be achieved thanks to the fan’s seven blades with flow acceleration channels on the suction side. Notably, the NH-asymmetrical D15S’s twin-tower design makes it one of the finest PCIe and RAM-compatible air coolers. Also, the ideal RAM clearance is around 65mm. Problem 2 - The Design: Due to the design of the chip only having the 3D v-cache on one of the two CCDs, core parking during gaming workloads is applied, meaning 6 cores and 6 threads are deactivated so you're only utilising the 6 cores and 6 threads that hold the 3D v-cache while gaming. When the 7800X3D launches that CPU only have 1 CCD which holds all the 3D v-cache meaning all 8 cores will be available during gaming. Tech4Gamers has been around for 12 years, and throughout that time, it has established itself as a go-to resource for reliable information on all things technological. KyaraM said:A regular 7950X or a 13900K are more than enough for a mixed gaming + productivity system, lmao. I would even argue that a step below that is plenty for most people, too. With this stupid thing, you trade a quite significant amount of productivity for some more gaming performance you don't need as much as you need food on the table. Read Igor's German review yesterday, in some cases where the 7950X is leading the 13900K in productivity, the 7950X3D places behind the 13900K. It sometimes even placed behind the freaking 7700X!!! How much is slightly better gaming performance worth to you?
Consequently, The density of the fins is ideal at 15FPI. As a result, the radiator is effective even when challenged by less airflow. The Eisbaer Pro Aurora is nearly completely made of practical water-cooling components. This cooler’s sturdy and long-lasting TPV hoses are often used in corporate products such as servers and workstations. The hose connections are likewise from Alphacool’s Enterprise line and are “ G1/4” in size. The cooler may become rather noisy when running at full rpm. To compensate for this, a quieter fan curve may be set for those who value silence above everything else. Verdict Again, an individual matter. E.g. if someone is playing just one game two hours a week, then depending on the game one may even argue that a console may be the top value option.However, the Ryzen 9 7900X3D is more energy-efficient at these lower speeds, making it an attractive option for gamers looking for a powerful and efficient CPU. Additionally, the Ryzen 9 7900X3D has a lower TDP than the Ryzen 9 7900X, further contributing to its efficiency. Overall, both CPUs are highly capable processors with impressive performance, but the Ryzen 9 7900X3D offers a larger cache size and lower TDP, which may make it a more attractive choice for users who prioritize energy efficiency and performance. Ryzen 9 7900X vs 7900X3D: Performance Overall, no one will be disappointed with this chip's performance, however pretty much everything else is a better option, I am overall happy with the chip however I do have some buyers remorse as the alternatives either, perform better or cost less and potentially in the case of the 7800X3D - both!
Great Deal 
New Comment