Joined in 2023 
82 
63 About this deal
The people before”, though not in the story as characters, influence much of the story and the attitude of the characters. The father has no time to think of them except when Jim displays the greenstone adzes. Even then the father does not relate to the “people before”; his thought is only about how much they could be worth. The people before were so intimately connected to the land that they have carried the old man to the spot where he was born so that he could see it one more time before dying. The narrator’s father on the other hand frequently talks of selling the farm when the going gets tough. The land is just something that he owns and puts to work. I have given it three stars, only because I didn't like Jess very much. If I'd felt more for the main character it would have been four stars. I would happily look for more novels by this author and would recommend the read as something twisty and atmospheric. Unfortunately, it was spoiled a bit by the repetitive writing and the unlikeable characters. Jess was the absolute worst – whiny, self-centered and naive – and her marriage to Pete made little sense as he also came across as an utter d-bag. I also didn’t get why Jess ever became friends with Eve. She was lonely and desperate – I understand that much – but surely if your husband and your new friend who you’ve only known for a couple of weeks started behaving so inappropriately right in front of you on the very first meeting, you’d cut that off? The children were also very irritating. In fact, the only character I did like was Graham the renovator, largely because he seemed to be the only one who spoke any sense and got himself outta there asap.
Soon Eve is at Maple House where she has lots of ideas about what could be done to restore it to its former grandeur. Lastly the settings. I loved the house. It was a character in itself. It was cleverly written to seem both spooky and not, depending on how you were looking at it. There was enough description to give you an idea of the house, but the main focus of the story was on the characters and their thoughts, feelings and actions. Mildred and Richard Loving answer questions at a press conference the day after the Supreme Court ruled in their favor in Loving v. Virginia. (Credit: Francis Miller/The LIFE Picture Collection/Getty Images) The end of the story, particularly the final line, is a puzzle. What is it which the narrator won’t forgive? What has his brother done? Like their father’s experience of sustaining himself in war by thinking of his ‘kingdom’, the roots of the unspoken rift are in warfare and land. Jim too has focused his mind while under fire in the Second World War by thinking of ‘That old place of ours.’ Jim, once the excited boy with ‘bright’ eyes of excitement about his discovery of the greenstone and Tom’s stories, has clung to those memories. yet he now speaks of them with casual insouciance, casually referring to ‘that old Maori’ and ‘those greenstones’ which he only ‘seem[s] to remember trying to give away’. They are now just a ‘souvenir’.
Featured Reviews
Jess and her husband need a new start. So when the chance to buy a rambling old house in the Suffolk countryside comes up, they leap at it. On May 17, 1954, the U.S. Supreme Court delivered its verdict in Brown v. Board of Education, ruling unanimously that racial segregation in public schools violated the 14th Amendment’s mandate of equal protection of the laws of the U.S. Constitution to any person within its jurisdiction. Oliver Brown, the lead plaintiff in the case, was one of almost 200 people from five different states who had joined related NAACP cases brought before the Supreme Court since 1938. People in the village seem to have a strange look on their face when Jess mentions where she lives. There’s a history to the house, and Jess’s new friend Eve is happy to fill her in on the more interesting details. You soon grow to appreciate that several characters are living in the past and it’s not going to end well. In the second half there are some elements of subterfuge and sabotage with betrayal aplenty. The writing was gripping and tapped in to some of my fears. It was cleverly written from two different perspectives. So many different things happened, but they all tied up well. The writing was clear and kept me interested throughout.
The initial atmosphere of the book felt unnecessarily exaggerated. As we learn more about each of the characters it was clear that the reality of the problems were more character driven. By the time we were told exactly what was happening and why, I found myself quite disengaged. Everything felt simply too much. The story was split into a prologue and 3 parts (two of which were labelled with the character whose viewpoint we would be reading) with chapters that weren't overly long in each part and were similar in length. There was a good pace to the story with lots of little bits going on. Things were dropped then were gradually explained, which made me want to keep on reading to see how it would all turn out. Even though there were lots of little bits I didn't get lost or confused by what was going on.Governor George Wallace was a leading foe of desegregation, and Birmingham had one of the strongest and most violent chapters of the Ku Klux Klan. Birmingham had become a leading focus of the civil rights movement by the spring of 1963 when Martin Luther King Jr. was arrested there while leading supporters of his Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) in a nonviolent campaign of demonstrations against segregation. This book is written brilliantly, hooking the reader in to experience the emotions along with the characters. This is every bit as accomplished as Northedge’s debut The House Guest, with the same precise and finely tuned use of language, by no means always a given in the genre.’ FINANCIAL TIMES However, just as things are spiralling out of control for Jess, the perspective changes and we see a different side of things. This for me rather broke the tension the author had built up. I would really have liked the novel to have continued from Jess's point of view and although it does return to it at the end, the thread had broken somewhat. The best bit of this is the atmospheric ambience it does have a very creepy ominous vibe that promises much but it then fails to deliver. In conclusion this for me didn’t deliver the goods a slow pace combined with mostly unlikable individuals is my final take home. I voluntarily reviewed a copy of The People Before.
US Representative Shirley Chisholm of Brooklyn announces her entry for Democratic nomination for the presidency, at the Concord Baptist Church in Brooklyn, New York on January 25, 1972. This is a gripping plot that starts with a slow, spine tingling start that feels very creepy and unsettling, and then…..and then comes a switch in the narrator….think total gear change and foot flat on the accelerator pedal! On p 206 the mother says “perhaps they’ve got happy memories of this place”. After reading Part 2, how does this statement seem ironic? The first half of this book left me jumping between different theories - is it the husband? the friend? her own madness? someone else? supernatural? the neighbour?Rosa Parks sitting in front of a bus in Montgomery, Alabama, after the Supreme Court ruled segregation illegal on the city bus system on December 21st, 1956. Whilst I can’t say I warmed to any of the characters, North also does a reasonable job of making their (often very poor) life choices understandable. That said, the characters were – for me – the element of the book that I struggled most with. Although clearly traumatised and isolated, I found Jess to be a rather neurotic and self-absorbed narrator and, as such, couldn’t really bring myself to care about her difficulties fitting into her new home. Whilst I totally understand that good domestic suspense relies upon certain tropes, I also felt that the characters occasionally devolved into clichés: the neurotic suburban mother, the secretive husband, the creepy neighbour, the ‘so-nice-she’s-suspicious’ friend, the ‘unfriendly-villagers-who-hate-outsiders’ etc. As the novel progressed, I did find myself wanting Jess to act on her misgivings about her new life and make a better one for herself and her children but, without giving away any major spoilers for the ending, this never really comes to fruition which I found a little disappointing. Towards the end of part 1, Jim goes to the abandoned hill area. He finds a cave with adzes and also a human skull. What is the father’s attitude to the adzes? What does the author hint at now about ‘the people before’? Around the same time, the mechanization of spinning and weaving had revolutionized the textile industry in England, and the demand for American cotton soon became insatiable. Production was limited, however, by the laborious process of removing the seeds from raw cotton fibers, which had to be completed by hand. I read through the night to finish this thriller… Spooky, tense, richly atmospheric and profoundly moving’ ERIN KELLY
Also Pete’s motivations, towards the end, didn’t convince me at all and he never really came alive as a character. A native of Connecticut, John Brown struggled to support his large family and moved restlessly from state to state throughout his life, becoming a passionate opponent of slavery along the way. After assisting in the Underground Railroad out of Missouri and engaging in the bloody struggle between pro- and anti-slavery forces in Kansas in the 1850s, Brown grew anxious to strike a more extreme blow for the cause. The People Before is both creepy and compelling. Charlotte Northedge builds layers of suspense so well that you can almost feel the chilly presence in the corner of the room. The story is told alternately by Jess and Eve. You see how differently each perceives certain events. The conclusion is surprising and inevitable. 5 stars.
Beyond that, we need to rebuild a fighting left that turns anger onto the real culprits of class rule – the bankers, vulture funds and capitalists who squeeze us while encouraging fear and division. So she is hugely relieved when she meets Eve, who works in a local gallery and Eve is warm and friendly towards her. The two women discover they have interests in common and Jess enjoys going for a coffee with her new friend. Northedge drops hints for the reader about what has gone wrong in the marriage but readers have to wait to get the whole story and enjoy guessing what may have prompted the move. On March 6, 1857, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its decision in Scott v. Sanford, delivering a resounding victory to southern supporters of slavery and arousing the ire of northern abolitionists. During the 1830s, the owner of an enslaved man named Dred Scott had taken him from the slave state of Missouri to the Wisconsin territory and Illinois, where slavery was outlawed, according to the terms of the Missouri Compromise of 1820.
Great Deal 
New Comment