Joined in 2023 
82 
63 About this deal
The first monitor I got was a Acer XF240QSbiipr - TN. I know, I know, life taught me already, that I should do my research before build literally anything so I read much (for a few days actually) about panels, hz, response rate, yadda yadda. I heard about worse colors, viewing angles and all that, but I haven't had any TNs in years (8-9?) personally, and the ones I had in my previous workplace weren't actually bad for normal text usage. I wanted to test out the function of the newest ones as well. It was ok, the hz jump was nice. Colors were ok after some fiddling in the settings - a bit I could have gotten used to it, I'm sure. But I needed it for vertical use - which on a TN was indeed abyssmal. Nevertheless, if I wanted a pure gaming monitor or even for just daily normal horizontal use, it would have been a nice buy. The ratio between the horizontal and the vertical side of the display. Some of the standard and widely used aspect ratios are 4:3, 5:4, 16:9 and 16:10. Information about the brightness of the screen. It is measured in candela per square metre (cd/m²).
In terms of supported graphics resolutions, it works with 1920 x 1080, making it an excellent choice for Full HD content. The contrast ratio, both typical and dynamic, is 1100:1 and 80000000:1 respectively.
Technical specification
Luminance is an essential feature on the subject of performance because it affects visual comfort. Additional luminosity is consistently fancied, but not truly fundamental in some contexts. The G-Master G2470HSU-B1 offers 250 candela per square metre. This amount of vividness is not great, specially if it supports High Dynamic Range on the grounds that HDR requires even more nt to show videos in actual HDR. Although it is okay for SDR ones . Iiyama G-Master G2470HSU-B1: Where Do We Stand On It? Settings of the monitor menu itself.It’s very cool that you can set the time after which the menu disappears by itself and turn off the blue LED-LED in the lower right corner of the monitor frame.
In the end, I was happy to spend 16k on this monitor. I got everything that was important to me from him: an excellent monolithic height-adjustable stand that firmly holds the monitor on the table; a good ips-matrix with a high-quality picture with natural colors and really minimal illumination for ips-matrices; 165 Hz.Approximate height of the display. If the manufacturer does not provide such information, the height is calculated from the diagonal and the aspect ratio.
There are various panel technologies. Each has its own specific features - viewing angles, color reproduction, response time, brightness/contrast, production cost, etc. The image quality depends directly on the type of the display panel used. I actually just wanted to share my story and maybe listen to other peoples choices and experiences with something similar as well. Approximately a month ago I began the search for a new monitor - for the last years I've been using an 17,3'' Laptop, so a jump to about 24'' would already be a big step.I'm mostly working/reading and casually gaming on it, don't really have time or craving for newest games so it was enough, but recent work really spurred me to get a bigger screen for eyes and watching pleasure. I wanted to get something solid, for when maybe I finally build a solid PC, but yeah... The maximum number of colors, which the display is able to reproduce, depends on the type of the panel in use and color enhancing technologies like FRC.
Great Deal 
New Comment