Joined in 2023 
82 
63 About this deal
Still more, Sergeev’s choice to use the adjective ‘punitive’ (in the text cited above) carries a clear, intended sense of ‘just, deserved punishment’ for aggressive violations against the innocent, assaulted Russian victims. (37) Meanwhile, the Kazakh scholar Akseleu Seidimbek insists, from the perspective of the colonized, that for his people it accomplished not justice, but instead only ‘cast the hell of colonization into their consciousness’. (38) Another Kazakh scholar, Abdizhapar Abdakimuhli, agrees, calling it nothing but ‘oppressive over-lordship’. (39) The biggest problem is that the game board is just a little on the small side. This results in the playing pieces covering up names if they start congregating around the same destination. If they could just make the board bigger it would solve this niggle! To take a Ferry a similar approach is taken. Players stop at the ferry port, take a hazard card and as long as the hazard card doesn’t take them elsewhere on their next turn they can take the ferry. a b "Second Afghan War". www.nam.ac.uk. Archived from the original on 2 November 2021 . Retrieved 15 December 2022. Several scholars have focused on the role of legends and mysticism (sometimes interpreted as a form of Orientalism that was prominent in the late 19th and early 20th century), during the Great Game and in its aftermath.
It would undermine the old Islamic regimes of central Asia leading to a frantic war among the powers for shares of the spoils.Ali Masjid and the British Camp, 1878". www.wdl.org. 5 November 1878. Archived from the original on 29 February 2020 . Retrieved 29 February 2020.
a b "ANGLO-RUSSIAN CONVENTION OF 1907". Encyclopedia Iranica. Archived from the original on 29 April 2011 . Retrieved 22 August 2021.Second Anglo-Afghan War | 1878–1880". Encyclopedia Britannica. Archived from the original on 19 July 2022 . Retrieved 29 February 2020.
Preceding Kenessary were a host of earlier uprisings against Russian rule, including not only the Pugachev Revolt (1773–5) in which thousands of Kazakhs participated, but the Kazakh uprising led by Batir Srim Datov (1783–97), the joint struggles led by Zholaman Tlenshiev (1820–35) and Sarzhan Kasimuhli (1824–36), and the mutually cooperative movements of Isatai Taimanov and Mahambet Utemisov (1836–1840). (36) In Sergeev’s view though, it was ‘Russian tolerance for local traditions’ which ‘revived the aspirations of dissidents to stir up anti-Russian uprisings’, with his only example being the Andijan uprising of 1897–8 (pp. 332–3). But rather than offer serious attention to genuine opposition against the Russian advance, Sergeev instead highlights those Central Asians who ‘often acted as pathfinders’, ‘voluntarily allied with Russian armies’, ‘welcomed’ the invading conquerors, ‘bec[a]me Russian subjects by their own will’, and ‘agreed that the incorporation of the Central Asian peoples into the Russian Empire was more progressive than’ the other available options (pp. 58, 111, 332). Taking this angle of approach of course lends support to his contention that ‘Russian rule was definitely more understandable for natives who were not really ready to fully accept Western civilization’ (p. 332). Despite the board being on the small side, this is a great educational family game. And also a fun way to plan places you can visit together! Quoted in Ira Klein, "English Free Traders and Indian Tariffs, 1874—96," Modern Asian Studies (1971). 5(3), 251–271, note 13.
The End of the Great Game
C. Collin Davies (1932) Cambridge University Press. p. 158 The Problem of the North-West Frontier:1890–1908 In the 1850s, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels accused MP and PM Lord Palmerston of colluding with Russia during the Crimean War. At the time, Marx alleged that Palmerston weakened Britain's defense of the Ottoman Empire. [135] [136] [137] Although this view was not otherwise widespread, the same accusation was levied by David Urquhart (1805-1877). [138] [136] [139] 1912 map of Central and South Asia The Indo-European Telegraph Line, which allowed London to communicate with its colony in India from 1870 onward, was built through the territory of the Russian Empire, during the 'Great Game' between Russia and Britain. [140] Nevertheless, an all-British-owned line Eastern Telegraph Company also completed its first India connection in 1870, the same year. a b c d e f g Andreeva, Elena (2007). Russia and Iran in the great game: travelogues and Orientalism. London: Routledge. pp.20, 63–76. ISBN 978-0-203-96220-6. OCLC 166422396. Archived from the original on 24 January 2023 . Retrieved 24 October 2021. In 1856, Persia commenced an assault on Herat and the British Home Government declared war on Persia. The Anglo-Persian War was conducted under Major General Sir James Outram until 1857, when Persia and Britain both withdrew and Persia signed a treaty renouncing its claim on Herat. [60] Further expansion [ edit ] Under the British Crown [ edit ] a b Phanjoubam, Pradip (2016). The Northeast question: conflicts and frontiers. New Delhi. pp.146–152. ISBN 978-1-317-34003-4. OCLC 944186170. {{ cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher ( link)
Great Deal 
New Comment