The most basic property of stars is that their radiant energy must derive from internal sources. Given the great length of time that stars endure (some 10 billion years in the case of the Sun), it can be shown that neither chemical nor gravitational effects could possibly yield the required energies. Instead, the cause must be nuclear events wherein lighter nuclei are fused to create heavier nuclei, an inevitable by-product being energy (see nuclear fusion).
You are watching: How does a star produce energy
In the interior of a star, the particles move rapidly in every direction because of the high temperatures present. Every so often a proton moves close enough to a nucleus to be captured, and a nuclear reaction takes place. Only protons of extremely high energy (many times the average energy in a star such as the Sun) are capable of producing nuclear events of this kind. A minimum temperature required for fusion is roughly 10 million K. Since the energies of protons are proportional to temperature, the rate of energy production rises steeply as temperature increases.
For the Sun and other normal main-sequence stars, the source of energy lies in the conversion of hydrogen to helium. The nuclear reaction thought to occur in the Sun is called the proton-proton cycle. In this fusion reaction, two protons (1H) collide to form a deuteron (a nucleus of deuterium, 2H), with the liberation of a positron (the electron’s positively charged antimatter counterpart, denoted e+). Also emitted is a neutral particle of very small mass called a neutrino, ν. While the helium “ash” remains in the core where it was produced, the neutrino escapes from the solar interior within seconds. The positron encounters an ordinary negatively charged electron, and the two annihilate each other, with much energy being released. This annihilation energy amounts to 1.02 megaelectron volts (MeV), which accords well with Einstein’s equation E = mc2 (where m is the mass of the two particles, c the velocity of light, and E the liberated energy).
Next, a proton collides with the deuteron to form the nucleus of a light helium atom of atomic weight 3, 3He. A “hard” X-ray (one of higher energy) or gamma-ray (γ) photon also is emitted. The most likely event to follow in the chain is a collision of this 3He nucleus with a normal 4He nucleus to form the nucleus of a beryllium atom of weight 7, 7Be, with the emission of another gamma-ray photon. The 7Be nucleus in turn captures a proton to form a boron nucleus of atomic weight 8, 8B, with the liberation of yet another gamma ray.
The 8B nucleus, however, is very unstable. It decays almost immediately into beryllium of atomic weight 8, 8Be, with the emission of another positron and a neutrino. The nucleus itself thereafter decays into two helium nuclei, 4He. These nuclear events can be represented by the following equations:
In the course of these reactions, four protons are consumed to form one helium nucleus, while two electrons perish.
The mass of four hydrogen atoms is 4 × 1.00797, or 4.03188, atomic mass units; that of a helium atom is 4.0026. Hence, 0.02928 atomic mass unit, or 0.7 percent of the original mass, has disappeared. Some of this has been carried away by the elusive neutrinos, but most of it has been converted to radiant energy. In order to keep shining at its present rate, a typical star (e.g., the Sun) needs to convert 674 million tons of hydrogen to 670 million tons of helium every second. According to the formula E = mc2, more than four million tons of matter literally disappear into radiation each second.
This theory provides a good understanding of solar energy generation, although for decades it suffered from one potential problem. The neutrino flux from the Sun was measured by different experimenters, and only one-third of the flux of electron neutrinos predicted by the theory was detected. (Neutrinos come in three types, each associated with a charged lepton: electron neutrino, muon neutrino, and tau neutrino.) Over that time, however, the consensus grew that the solar neutrino problem and its solution lay not with the astrophysical model of the Sun but with the physical nature of neutrinos themselves. In the late 1990s and the early 21st century, scientists discovered that neutrinos oscillate (change types) between electron neutrinos, the state in which they were created in the Sun, and muon or tau neutrinos, states that are more difficult to detect when they reach Earth.
The main source of energy in hotter stars is the carbon cycle (also called the CNO cycle for carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen), in which hydrogen is transformed into helium, with carbon serving as a catalyst. The reactions proceed as follows: first, a carbon nucleus, 12C, captures a proton (hydrogen nucleus), 1H, to form a nucleus of nitrogen, 13N, a gamma-ray photon being emitted in the process; thus, 12C + 1H → 13N + γ. The light 13N nucleus is unstable, however. It emits a positron, e+, which encounters an ordinary electron, e−, and the two annihilate one another. A neutrino also is released, and the resulting 13C nucleus is stable. Eventually the 13C nucleus captures another proton, forms 14N, and emits another gamma-ray photon. In symbols the reaction is represented by the equations 13N → 13C + e+ + ν; then 13C + 1H → 14N + γ. Ordinary nitrogen, 14N, is stable, but when it captures a proton to form a nucleus of light oxygen-15, 15O, the resulting nucleus is unstable against beta decay. It therefore emits a positron and a neutrino, a sequence of events expressed by the equations 14N + 1H → 15O + γ; then 15O → 15N + e+ + ν. Again, the positron meets an electron, and the two annihilate each other while the neutrino escapes. Eventually the 15N nucleus encounters a fast-moving proton, 1H, and captures it, but the formation of an ordinary 16O nucleus by this process occurs only rarely. The most likely effect of this proton capture is a breakdown of 15N and a return to the 12C nucleus—that is, 15N + 1H → 12C + 4He + γ. Thus, the original 12C nucleus reappears, and the four protons that have been added permit the formation of a helium nucleus. The same amount of mass has disappeared, though a different fraction of it may have been carried off by the neutrinos.
Only the hottest stars that lie on the main sequence shine with energy produced by the carbon cycle. The faint red dwarfs use the proton-proton cycle exclusively, whereas stars such as the Sun shine mostly by the proton-proton reaction but derive some contribution from the carbon cycle as well.
The aforementioned mathematical relationships permit the problem of stellar structure to be addressed notwithstanding the complexity of the problem. An early assumption that stars have a uniform chemical composition throughout their interiors simplified the calculations considerably, but it had to be abandoned when studies in stellar evolution proved that the compositions of stars change with age (see below Later stages of evolution). Computations need to be carried out by a step-by-step process known as numerical integration. They must take into account that the density and pressure of a star vanish at the surface, whereas these quantities and the temperature remain finite at the core.
Resulting models of a star’s interior, including the relation between mass, luminosity, and radius, are determined largely by the mode of energy transport. In the Sun and the fainter main-sequence stars, energy is transported throughout the outer layers by convective currents, whereas in the deep interior, energy is transported by radiation. Among the hotter stars of the main sequence, the reverse appears to be true. The deep interiors of the stars that derive their energy primarily from the carbon cycle are in convective equilibrium, whereas in the outer parts the energy is carried by radiation. The observed masses, luminosities, and radii of most main-sequence stars can be reproduced with reasonable and uniform chemical composition.
Chemically homogeneous models of giant and supergiant stars cannot be constructed. If a yellow giant such as Capella is assumed to be built like a main-sequence star, its central temperature turns out to be so low that no known nuclear process can possibly supply the observed energy output. Progress has been made only by assuming that these stars were once main-sequence objects that, in the course of their development, exhausted the hydrogen in their deep interiors. Inert cores consequently formed, composed mainly of the helium ash left from the hydrogen-fusion process. Since no helium nuclear reactions are known to occur at the few tens of millions of kelvins likely to prevail in these interiors, no thermonuclear energy could be released from such depleted cores. Instead, energy is assumed to be generated in a thin shell surrounding the inert core where some fuel remains, and it is presumably produced by the carbon cycle. Such models are called shell-source models. As a star uses up increasing amounts of its hydrogen supply, its core grows in mass while the outer envelope of the star continues to expand. These shell-source models explain the observed luminosities, masses, and radii of giants and supergiants.
The depletion of hydrogen fuel is appreciable even for a dwarf, middle-aged star such as the Sun. The Sun seems to have been shining at its present rate for about the last 20 percent of its current age of five billion years. For its observed luminosity to be maintained, the Sun’s central temperature must have increased considerably since the formation of the solar system, largely as a consequence of the depletion of the hydrogen in its interior along with an accompanying increase in molecular weight and temperature. During the past five billion years, the Sun probably brightened by about half a magnitude; in early Precambrian time (about two billion years ago), the solar luminosity must have been some 20 percent less than it is today.