Architecture

Garmin Forerunner 35 Vs Fitbit Versa 2, Compare Fitbit Versa 2 Vs Garmin Forerunner 35

I had Forerunner 225 which died after 3 years. So basically I want a running watch (GPS enabled). I never/rarely used the smartwatch function. So ideal scenario is

Sleep tracking

Activity Tracking (steps and elevation)

GPS jogging/running

Cycling

No smartwatch functions

Maximum battery life

I have read reviews but I wanted some first hand experience/reviews.

You are watching: Garmin forerunner 35 vs fitbit versa 2

Any input is appreciated.

UPDATE: Bought Forerunner 35

*

Why not go for the Forerunner 235 again? I had read that Amazon has a stock of refurb units at a good discount for Black Friday.

Sounds to me like the Vivoactive 3 is more what you’re looking for, or if you’re going for Fitbit, the Ionic. I’ve had both. The Ionic was great but it was so ugly, I couldn’t keep it.

I have the VA3 and my wife has a versa. She is pretty inactive so only uses it to track her bike rides but the gps is actually done through her phone. She wanted it for notifications and sleep tracking. For those, it’s been great.

For fitness, Garmin is hands down the better of the two. I love data and it gives you so much data. I run, trail run, bike and sometimes play sports. It works well for all of those.

The sleep tracking is waaayyyy better on a Fitbit though. Like, hands down. So depending on how important that is to you, hopefully one works out for you.

I had a versa for a month and returned it. I got a smaller garmin but vastly prefer the GPS and all the data from running.

See more: Derivative Of 1 Over Square Root Of X ) = Square Root Of X, Finding The Derivative Of The Square Root Of X

i had the 230. when it got damaged i got a 35. it's great. does everything i used from the 230. everything you list. no problems. battery lasts, i dunno, multiple days. maybe a bit under a week? i've not kept track, but it seems to rarely need charging (and then charges quickly while i'm working at my desk).

I had a Blaze for 2 years before the Fenix 5 I have now. In my experience the HR sensor on the Blaze was wildly inaccurate compared to the Garmin. There were many many times that it just didn't have a reading, which ultimately prompted me to upgrade it.

Now when I run on the treadmill (nearly daily), my Garmin is within 2 beats of the hand sensors – I understand those are very accurate bc it's checking the pulse from both hands.

Do you use Android or iOS? Fitbit has very unreliable syncing Android. I've had zero syncing issues with my Garmin. If you're on Android, I would take this into consideration.

The Versa is a fitness tracker with a nice screen and some smartwatch features. It can track running/cycling but relies on the GPS in your phone, it does not have built-in GPS. I use it day to day because it’s great for fitness and sleep tracking/silent alarms, it’s slim, and the battery lasts multiple days unlike the Apple Watch.

When I go out for a run, I put on a Garmin (previously Fenix 3, then 735xt, now Fenix 5s). They are much much better tools for running than the Fitbit in my opinion. To be honest the only reason I don’t wear a Garmin all the time is that I find them generally to be more bulky and less attractive, and I miss the better notification support of the Fitbit. The Garmin 645 looks like it’s getting pretty close to an ideal watch for day to day fitness tracking, notifications and running though…

See more: An Analysis Of Derived Characters Is Used To Generate A Ssification Flashcards

Anyway, if tracking runs and rides is the focus here, and considering you already mentioned you don’t particularly care about smartwatch features, then I would take pretty much any Garmin over the Versa. I don’t know the 35 personally so I don’t know if it can track rides, but definitely the 235 and up would be a good option.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Back to top button